
Our financial results were available three weeks before we published them
Stacy, Finance Director
Why this one is dangerous
Unpublished results are price sensitive. Once they are entered into an external service, the company can no longer say who holds them, where they are stored, or for how long.
Three weeks is the part that matters. That is the period in which the information was outside the company's control while remaining unpublished, and the period in which any dealing on it would have been dealing on inside information.
Stacy did nothing malicious. She used a tool that produced a better summary than the one she could write at eleven at night. No rule told her she could not.
How to combat it
- Classify results, forecasts, board papers and draft announcements as restricted, and block those classes at the egress point rather than in a policy document.
- Extend closed period controls to AI tools on the same footing as trading and communications. If the tool is not covered by the closed period, the closed period has a gap in it.
- Add AI tool access to the insider list process, so the population that can reach unpublished numbers is a list you can produce.
- Provide finance teams with a licensed instance carrying contractual no training terms and a defined retention period, before the reporting cycle rather than after it.
- Brief the finance function specifically. Generic AI training does not cover the moment at eleven at night when the summary is due.
Every person shown in this campaign is AI generated. Any resemblance to any person living or dead is purely coincidental.
The product names in the captions are invented and are used for satire. They are not real products. They are not associated with, endorsed by, or intended to identify any real company, product or service. Where the campaign's guidance refers to real services, it states only the providers' own published positions, linked to source, as at the date shown.