Khaled founded Exec x AI and leads its hardest engagements. You bring him in when an AI programme has to clear a board, an auditor and a regulator on the same day. He is a solicitor and an engineer, and he ran corporate and regulatory affairs at Microsoft across four Gulf states. So he reads the law, the architecture and the commercial case as one problem.
In 30 days you get three signed artefacts: the AI charter, the control mapping and the 12-week deployment plan, sized so the projected gain clears the spend before you commit. His Microsoft work put him across AI, cloud and data-protection policy with government authorities, which is the same ground your regulator now stands on.
He has carried legal and regulatory accountability inside regulated firms for two decades. Most AI programmes stall where law, risk and engineering meet. Few advisers hold all three. Your in-house team can build the model, but it rarely carries the legal accountability for it.
Khaled maps the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and DIFC Regulation 10 to one control set, so you evidence compliance once rather than four times. Khaled leads board advisory and AI governance engagements, plus responsible AI work for boards that answer to a regulator. He owns the charter and the regulatory position himself.
Named governance and engineering principals deliver, with no junior staff billed to your account. You pay for principals only, which is why the fee sits below a Big 4 charter for a fixed scope. Delivery runs in your own cloud, on your own intellectual property, with an audit trail your regulator can read.
The fixed price and a stop-before-you-spend test keep the firm's young trading history at our risk, not yours. Where the case does not hold, he will tell you to stop before you spend.